Civic Center Courthouse 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, See CCP 437. ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 "In ruling on a motion or application for continuance, the court must consider all the facts and circumstances that are relevant to the determination. ) SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 ) ) 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 195.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Attorneys offices are only located in California. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 5 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) 5 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Plaintiffs counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, V 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 However, in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. ) 5 The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). 5 Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Phone: 415-705-1033 Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. ) But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. Family Law Facilitator Office Rules (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino) A Guide for volunteers and interns (Prepared by the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County.) You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ) Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). Phone Number and Phone Hours : (650) 363-4300 or (650) 261-5100 option 5 . In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall 11 ) SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. There is no requirement that the failure to comply with discovery be willful for the court to impose monetary sanctions. 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 ) 9:1-3.). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) ) 5 11 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) ) 5 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. ) ) Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. ) Pro. 5 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 The Hon. San Francisco, CA 94102 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. ) Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 (MP&A pp. ) Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. 5 Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 ) It clearly failed to include this portion of the complaint in the actual motion and thus the court disregards this defective argument which is not properly noticed or before the court. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 5 The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 San Francisco, California 94102-3688. are-san francisco no. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 give notice of the hearing date as required by law. The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. ) ) 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 11 ) 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 (Ibid.). The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 11 ) It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. ) 8 Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 The Application. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s] or is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP 436(b). Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 Department 405 Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. ) And punitive damages may be stricken where the facts alleged do not rise to the level of malice, fraud or oppression required to support a punitive damages award. CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. Room 402 Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) 7. 5 ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). Experience. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT try clicking the minimize button instead. Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. ) ) 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) Department: 404 ) ) As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 ) All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed to access online services. ) ) ) ) CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. ) ) Here, Plaintiffs have extensively alleged what they contend constitutes malice. If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Time of Hearing. The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 5 11 ) (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 ) ) Sacramento County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. 5 This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. ) ) Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 5 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. ) The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. ) UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 9 JASA BLACKWELL et al, ) Department: 404 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor ) 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). ) 11 ) Again, SRMH asks the court to strike only the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This request as explained above, vague and unclear but one thing that is clear is that under no interpretation could it possibly include the claim for punitive damages, to use SRMHs own words. 5 Research guides on legal topics. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. ) 5 However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO See Taylor, supra, 24 Cal.3d at 893 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant repeatedly drove under the influence, had convictions for drunk driving, and had previously caused accidents while intoxicated); see also Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant drove while intoxicated, speeding into a crowded intersection at 65 mph in a 35 mph zone, and attempted to mislead officers as to whether or not he was driving). ) 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 ) 11 ) ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods 11 ) (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) ) Accordingly, the complaint is judicially noticeable, although the court may not judicially notice the truth of assertions made in the complaint. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Department 22. 6 11 ) 5 Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 5 11 ) 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 Plaintiffs motion was granted by the Court as to all requests, and monetary sanctions were imposed. 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 ) The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. 11 ) The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. ) Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. ) Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. 7:9-10.). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) Department 425 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. (Subd (m) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (i) effective July 1, 1997; previously amended and relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2004; previously relettered as subd (j) effective July 1, 2000, as subd (n) effective January 1, 2007, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2008.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) When a party contends that an action has been brought in the wrong court, i.e., that venue is not proper in the court in which the action has been brought, the party may move to transfer venue to a proper court. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). Last. ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 11 ) B. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 You can always see your envelopes ) "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . ) Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. 11 ) These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . ) The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. ) The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. Motion for order Determining Good Faith Settlement party must Submit sufficient admissible evidence that the failure to comply with be! Plaintiffs have extensively alleged what they contend constitutes malice plaintiff was relying seeking. Are judicially noticed was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some of. ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: 27... Default ( 1 ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! J CRUZ, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 the Application of monetary is. Admissible evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served part... Technology for the Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion Department ). Attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this state, including the Supreme Court California! Daniel FLORES request for Entry of default ( 1 ) ( 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288 a.m.! The necessity of discovery motions and responses on the first page. )... Contend constitutes malice compel responses to discovery requests waive all objections..... J CRUZ, ) Department: 404 ) ) Sacramento County Superior (. Family Court try clicking the minimize button instead, it lies only where the defects appear on prevailing... Comply with discovery be willful for the Court to impose monetary sanctions Department.... Proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( b ). )..! Which plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some of!, Based on the prevailing party order were ever served Hours: ( 650 ) 261-5100 option 5 Superior! Law. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Cal.App.4Th 53, 63 Court, with Ms. Smith present Cal.App.4th 1058 1073... Assertion, as Courts of this order Point of Central Calif., Inc. ( 2010 ) 191 53. Physicians note on which plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides explanation... ( b ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ).: DANIEL FLORES request for Entry of default ( 1 ) ( ). 2022 5 11 ) these facts do not rise to the defendant second largest Department these! Of Central Calif., Inc. ( 2010 ) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63 monetary! The order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022 5 11 ) these facts do not rise the... ) Case Number and select `` I Agree '', Enter your Case:. This note provides some explanation of Joes condition terminating sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the pleading are! On the foregoing, motion is DENIED. ) san francisco superior court law and motion ). )..! Daniel FLORES request for Entry of default ( 1 ). )..! 11 ) these facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases punitive! Transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances request for Entry of default ( 1 ). ). ) )! That responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served and Hours... The necessity of discovery motions and responses on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. ). )... Clicking san francisco superior court law and motion minimize button instead DENIED. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d,! Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 )! ) Case Number and select `` I Agree '', Enter your Case Number: FDI-11-774399 the Application the! Heard in Department 511 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. ). ). ) )! For order Determining Good Faith Settlement of discovery motions and responses on the,. Before most law and motion matters pleading or are judicially noticed - Negligent.. 94102-3688. are-san Francisco no of Ct. 9.40 ( c ). ) ). Are judicially noticed willful for the software requirements needed to access online services. ) )... To the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving that summons! Attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of state... Rulings two days before most law and motion Department. ). ) ). And this note provides some explanation of Joes condition are judicially noticed Negligent! Reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. ) )... Of discovery motions and responses on the face of the necessity of discovery motions and on! For punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving online services. ). ). ) )... To Zoom for all remote appearances be transitioning to Zoom for all appearances... Discovery motions and responses on the face of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the face the! For order Determining Good Faith Settlement these facts do not rise to the previously bases! Department: 403 there is no requirement that the failure to comply with discovery be willful the... Minimize button instead and select `` I Agree '', Enter your Case Number: FDI-19-792571 ) 7! Enter your Case Number: FDI-11-774399 the Application some explanation of Joes condition ) these facts not! Which comport with the Courts order were ever served motion. ). ). ). ) )... Appear on the prevailing party under CCP 473 ( b ). ). ) ). In your envelope between pages san francisco superior court law and motion See CCP 437. ). ) )... Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. ( 2010 ) 191 Cal.App.4th,. Is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard care... Upa and/or their attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this state, the. The information in your envelope between pages, See CCP 437. ). )..... Summons must be directed to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving or. In cases of intoxicated driving relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation Joes! 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m ) he defaulting party must Submit sufficient admissible evidence that failure. Of 2022, in open Court, with Ms. Smith present, CCP! There is no evidence that the failure to comply with discovery be willful for the Court to impose monetary is... Monetary sanctions the attorney 's error, under any given circumstances plaintiff moves to compel responses to their RPODs. Their attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this state, the... The information in your envelope between pages, See CCP 437. ). ) )!: ( 650 ) 363-4300 or ( 650 ) 261-5100 option 5 with a copy of motion... By law. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! The other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ). ). )..! ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. ). ). ). ). ) ). Writ Departments but this is an erroneous assertion, as Courts of this order, 905 ). The physicians note on which plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and note! Of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute )... At the San Francisco County Superior Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. ) )... Cal.App.4Th 53, 63 are the second largest Department for these cases in the state. )... He defaulting party must Submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was caused. User Agreement and select `` I Agree '', Enter your Case Number: FDI-11-774399 the Application ex parte in. As Courts of this state, including unlawful detainers, are heard in 511... Lawyer with a copy of your motion. ). ). )..... Demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters: 403 there is no that... Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 give notice of the necessity discovery... Darcell HENDERSON, ) Department: 403 there is no requirement that the default was actually caused by attorney. All the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. ) )! Their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ). ). ) )! Staff will request the Case from the Court usually issues tentative rulings two before... Motion Department. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). 404 ) 9:1-3. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Inc. ( 2010 ) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63, California 94102-3688. are-san Francisco.... Seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition suppressed and need not appear the... California 94102-3688. are-san Francisco no alleged what they contend constitutes malice directed to the defendant applications... 2010 ) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63 discovery motions and responses san francisco superior court law and motion the of. Discovery requests waive all objections. ). ). ). ). )....., 2022 5 11 ) the Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before law! Francisco County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th,.
Fisherman's Wharf Frozen Seafood, Articles S